← All episodes
Are You Using Expensive AI to Solve Cheap Problems?

Episode

Are You Using Expensive AI to Solve Cheap Problems?

June 08, 2026·8 min
Download MP3

Most companies bought AI the easy way: a premium license for everyone. Caio and Marina break down why that's become invisible waste on engineering teams, use Claude Code and Goose as opposite examples, and introduce a new discipline taking shape: AI FinOps. The question is no longer which AI is best — it's which AI is good enough for each task.

In this episode

01 Opening: the waste nobody sees
  • Caio's hook: maybe your company isn't spending too much on AI — maybe it's using expensive AI for cheap problems. Marina reacts the way the audience would, a little skeptical.
  • The common scenario: company buys a horizontal premium license, everyone gets the same thing, nobody measures who uses it for what.
  • The episode's key turn: the next big savings in tech isn't firing devs, it's stopping paying for premium AI on tasks that don't need premium AI.
  • Marina raises the practical question: okay, but how do I know I'm wasting money? Caio teases that the numbers tell the story.
02 The scary bill
  • Caio drops the real numbers: Claude Pro at 20 bucks, Team Standard 20 per user, Premium 100, and the kicker — Claude Code token consumption, 150 to 250 dollars per dev per month in enterprise.
  • The 50-dev simulation: ranges from 12k a year on Standard to 150k a year using Claude Code heavily. Marina reacts to the jump.
  • Caio cuts off a cliché on the spot: this doesn't mean Claude is too expensive. It means AI usage needs to become cost management, just like cloud became FinOps.
  • Marina builds the bridge: so it's like when everyone realized the AWS bill was blowing up and had to learn to control it.
03 The mistake of treating everyone like a power user
  • Caio separates the two worlds: there are people refactoring legacy codebases, debugging hard bugs, touching architecture. And there are people asking for variable names and task summaries on the same 100-dollar license.
  • Concrete example for Marina to picture: the dev using Claude Code to understand an entire codebase justifies the cost. The one only writing simple docs doesn't.
  • The strong line: the problem isn't paying for Claude, it's paying for Claude on a task something else could solve.
  • Marina pushes back: but doesn't giving everyone good tools boost team morale? Caio answers with the difference between purchasing simplicity and operational efficiency.
04 Goose enters as a counterpoint
  • Caio introduces Goose without the hype: open source agent from Block, Apache 2.0 license, runs on your machine, has desktop, CLI and API, supports MCP and lets you pick among several model providers.
  • The honest disclaimer that builds credibility: Goose is free in license, not in total cost. You still have tokens, setup, governance and maintenance.
  • The line that sums it up: open source doesn't eliminate cost, it gives you back choice. You decide when to use an expensive, cheap or local model.
  • Marina asks the obvious: so is it Claude or Goose? Caio knocks down the false choice, says the right answer is a usage matrix.
05 The AI stack by complexity, and governance
  • Caio sketches the layers: premium for critical and complex tasks, open source for medium tasks and internal workflows, local or cheap models for simple tasks, and humans for sensitive decisions.
  • The security point a lot of people forget: a code agent touches files, runs commands, accesses data. Saving on licenses without governance can get expensive.
  • The minimum policy Caio defends: who can use which agent, in which repo, with which permissions, which logs, and which human review.
  • Marina lands it: so savings without clear rules is a trap. Caio confirms with a real risk example.
06 Practical wrap-up: engineering AI FinOps
  • Caio names the new discipline: AI FinOps — controlling tokens, agents, licenses, usage limits, consumption per user and return per task.
  • The second phase of adoption: the first was giving everyone the tool, the second is figuring out who actually needs what.
  • The question Caio leaves for every CTO: am I buying productivity, or am I buying hype per user?
  • Action item for the listener: before renewing a contract, make a simple map of who uses it, for what, and how much it costs per task. Marina closes by challenging the audience to look at their own bill.
Papo de CAIO
0:00
0:00